Hello again,
Before delving into some of the comments below, I would like to apologise. I used a poor choice of wording that came off as an attack.
Regarding your comments, I have addressed them below:
7.2 Eligibility
The 30 day requirement has been removed entirely.
7.3 Annuities
The annuities in place are based on a risk threshold appropriate for the level of expected play. This is a bingo-centric brand that is not currently aimed at players accustomed to exceptionally large bets.
It is also a discretionary clause, which may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis. There have been many instances with regular players where the whole amount has been paid outright.
7.6 Time of Payment
This has been adjusted to be a maximum time of one week. It may be the same or next day in certain situations, but we do not want to set the expectations at a level that won't be consistently met.
7.8 Limits and Fees
This has been now been reduced to five (5) times:
"There are expenses and risk associated with processing deposits and withdrawals; for this reason, you must wager your deposit at least five (5) times prior to requesting a withdrawal. If you do not intend to wager your deposit at least five (5) times, please do not deposit. Management may make exceptions for regular players."
11.2 Abandoned Accounts
The fee has been removed altogether.
--
In general, the spirit of the terms you highlighted were intended to be protective rather than predatory. The reason most of these were (and are) made discretionary is to protect against illegitimate behaviour - not to penalize real players.
I trust that you find these updates fair and hope that you can accept my sincerest apologies regarding my previous comments.
James
Share on
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit